Sec 37:-That the parties to a contract must either perform or offer to perform, their respective promises unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of contract Act, or of any other law.
Performance: – Two types
- Actual performance – actually performed – liability of such a party comes to an end.
- Attempted performance or tender of performance refusal to accept offer of performance by promise 
Promisor is not responsible for non performance and they can sue the promisee for breach of contract – nor he (promisor) thereby lose his rights under the contract.
Essential of Valid tender
- At a proper place
- For whole obligation
- Of exact amount and in legal tender money
- At proper time
- Reasonable opportunity to Promisee
Tender or offer of performance to be valid must satisfy the following conditions:-
- It must be unconditional
Ex :- ‘X’ offers to ‘Y’ the principal amount of the loan. This is not a valid tender since the whole amount of principal and interest is not offered.
- It must be made at a proper time and place.
Ex:- If the promisor wants to deliver the goods at 1 am. This is not a valid tender unless it was so agreed;
- Reasonable opportunity to examine goods.
Ex:- Delivery of something to the promise by the promisor promise must have reasonable opportunity of inspection.
- It must be for the whole obligation :- goods and amount.
Ex:- ‘X’ a debtor, offer’s to pay ‘Y’ the debt due in installments and tenders the first installment. This is not a valid tender minor deviation – not invalid [Behari lal v ram gulam]
- It must be made to the promise or his duty authorized agent.
Ex:- It must be person who is willing to person his part of performance.
- In case of payment of money, tender must be of the exact amount due and it must be in the legal tender.
Types of Tender
- Tender of goods and services
When a promisor offers to delivery of goods or service to the promise, it is said to be tender of goods or services, if promisee does not accept a valid tender, It has the following effects:
- The promisor is not responsible for non – performance of the contract.
- The promisor is discharged from his obligation under the contract. Therefore, he need not offer again.
- He does not lose his right under the contract. Therefore, he can sue the promise.
- Tender of money
Tender of money is an offer to make payment. In case a valid tender of money is not accepted, it will have the following effects:
- The offer or is not discharged from his obligation to pay the amount.
- The offer or is discharged from his liability for payment of interest from the date of the tender of money.
Effect of refusal of party to perform promise Wholly Sec 39.
Promisor – Refuse – Promise – wholly
Promisee can put – can end of the contract or – he can continue the contract if he has given his consent either by words or – by conducts in its continuance.
Result – claim damages. [compensation]
Who can demand performance?
- Promisee – stranger can’t demand performance of the contract.
- Legal Representative – legal representative can demand Exception performance.
- contrary intention appears from the contract
- contract is of a personal nature.
- Third party – Exception to “stranger to a contract”
Person by whom promise is to be performed Sec 40
[who will perform the contract ]
- Promisor himself :- include personal skill, taste or art work.
Ex:- ‘A’ promises to paint a picture for ‘B’ as this promise involves personal skill of ‘A’. If must be performed by ‘A’.
- Promisor or agent :- [does not involves personal skill]
- Legal Representative [does not involve personal skill and taste]
- Third person [Sec 41] :- Acceptance of promise from the third party:-
If the promisor accepts performance of a contract by a third party, he can’t after wards enforce the performance against the promisor although the promisor had neither authorized not ratified the act of the third party.
[In other meaning once the promise accepts the performe from a third person, he cannot compel the promisor the perform the contract again]
Performance of Joint Promises:-
Two or more person make a promise
- Performed by all the joint promisor 
- All the joint promisor – liable
- Thus in India the liability of joint promisors is joint as well as several.
In England, however the liability of the joint promisors is only joint and not several and accordingly all the joint promisors must be sued jointly.
- Liability of joint promisor 
- Liability – joint as well as several [unless express A + B + C 900 D. D may compel either A, B or C or any of two of them or all of them.
- Where a joint promisor has been compelled to perform the whole promise, be may compel every other joint promisor to contribute equally with himself to the performance of the promise (unless a contrary intention appears from the contract).
C – 9000 – D A(3000) + B(3000) – C
- If any one of the joint promisors make default in such contribution, the remaining joint promisors must bear the loss arising from such default in equal shares
A + B + C – 9000 (A) – Insolvent B + C = 4500 + 4500 = 9000
Sec 44:- Release of one joint promisor :- where one of the joint promisors is released other joint promisors shall continue to be liable.
[In English law if one joint promisor – discharge then all the joint promisors discharge]
Sec 45:- Rights to claim performance of joint [Devolution of joint rights]
- During their joint lives – all the joint promisors .
- After the death of any of them – The representative of such deceased promise jointly with the surging promise
- With the representatives of all jointly.
Ex:- ‘A’ in consideration of Rs 50,000 lent to him by ‘B’ and ‘ C’ promises ‘B’ and ‘C’ jointly to replace them that sum with interest on a day specifies.
‘B’ dies. The right to claim performance rests with ‘B’ representatives jointly with ‘c’ during ‘C’ life.
And after ‘C’s death with the representatives of ‘B’ and ‘C’ jointly .
Time place and manner of performance [46 – 50]
- No time is specified for performance [Sec 46]
- Time of performance is not specified + promisor agreed to perform without, a demand from the promise the performance must be made within a reasonable time. Reasonable time – in each particulars case – a question of fact.
- Time specified but hour not mentioned .
Time of performance specified + promisor agreed to perform without application by the promisee
- Performance must perform on the day fixed during the usual business hours and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed.
- Where Time is fixed and application to be made 
- Proper place and within the usual hour of business
- Promisee to apply for performance
- Performance of promise where no place is specified and no application is to be made by the promise 
- It is the duty of the promisor to apply to the promise to appoint a reasonable place for the performance and perform it at such appointed place.
- Performance in manner or at time prescribed or sanctioned by promise 
- In such prescribed manner and
- Prescribed time
Ex:- ‘A’ desires ‘B’ who owes him Rs 10,000 to send him a promissory note for Rs 10,000 by Post. The debt is discharged as soon as ‘B’ puts into the post a letter containing the promissory note duly addressed to ‘A’.
Performance of reciprocal promises
Reciprocal Promise :- Promises which form the consideration or part of consideration for each other as called reciprocal promises.
- Mutual and Independent:- Such promises all to be performed by each party independently without waiting for the other party to perform his promise can’t excuse himself on the ground of non-performance by the default party.
- Mutual and Dependent:- Sue damage . The performance of promise by one party depended on the prior performance of the promise by other party.
[The party at fault becomes liable to pay compensation to the other party may sustain by the non performance of the contract – 
- Mutual and concurrent: – when reciprocal promises are to be performed simultaneously a promisor need not perform his part unless the promise is ready and willing to perform 
Order of performance of reciprocal promises 
- Where the order in which reciprocal promises one to be performed is expressly fixed by the contract – they must be performed in that order.
- Order is not expressly fixed – nature of transaction requires
Ex :- ‘A’ and ‘B’ contract that ‘A’ shall build a house for ‘B’ at a fixed price ‘A’ promise to build the house must be performed before its promise to pay for it.
Sec 53 :- One party preventing – voidable at the option of the other party so prevented.
– Compensation for loss
Sec 54 :- Legal and illegal
Legal – valid, illegal – void
Sec 58:- alternative promise, one branch being illegal legal branch alone can be enforced.
- A – B – 1000 rupees
- Deliver – rice + smuggled goods
Time as the essence of the contract (Sec 55)
Where time is essence – the concerned parties must perform their respective promises within the specified time.
Time are fact :- time is specified for the performance of the contract is not by itself sufficient to prove that time is essence of the contract- Intention of the parties.
Time is generally considered to be the essence of the contract :-
- where the parties have expressly agreed to treat as the essence of the contract.
- Delay operates as an injury to the party and
- Nature and necessities of the contracts requires it to be performs within the specified time.
- Delivery of the goods – considered – essence of the contract payment of the price – No
[However in case of sale and purchase of an immoral property, the time is presumed to not the essence of the contract]
Time is essence of the contract – party tails to perform
- In time – the contract becomes voidable at the option the other party.
Time is not essence – only claim damages for delay in performance
Assignment of contract :- (a) by – operation of law
(b) By an act of parties
Assignment is a made of transferring rights.
Rules regarding assignment
- The liabilities or obligations under a contract can’t be assigned
- The rights and benefits under a contract which not of a personal nature can be assigned.
- An actionable claim can always be assigned
Appropriation of Payments :- [ Sec 59 – 61]
- Appropriation means application of payments – The question of appropriation of payments arises when a debtor owes several debts to the same creditor and make a payment that is not sufficient to discharge the whole indebtness.
- Appropriation of Payments
Sometimes, a debtor owes several distinct debts to the same creditor and he makes a payment which is insufficient to satisfy all the debts. In such a case, a question arises as to which particular debt the payment is to be appropriated. Section 59 to 61 of the Act lay down following rules as to appropriation of payments which provide an answer to this question.
- Appropriation as per express instructions
Every debtor who owes several debts to a creditor has a right to instruct his creditor to which particular debt, the payment is to be appropriated or adjusted. Therefore, where the debtor expressly states that the payment is to be applied to the discharge of a particular debt, the payment must be applied accordingly.
Example : A owes B three distinct debts of Rs.2,000, 3,000 and 5,000. A sends Rs.5,000 and instructs B that the payment should be appropriated against the third debt. He is bound to appropriate the payment against the third debt only.
- Appropriation as per express instructions
- Application of payment where debt to be discharge is not indicated 
If section 60 is attracted, the creditor shall have the discretion to apply such payment for any lawful debt which is due to him from the person making the payment.
Example: A owes to B, among other debts, the sum of Rs.520. B writes to A and demands payment of this sum. A sends to B Rs.520. This payment is to be applied to the discharge of the debt of which B had demanded payment.
- Application of payment where neither party appropriates 
The payment shall be applied in discharge of the debts in order of time whether they are or are not based by the limitation Act 1963, if the debt are of equal standing (i.e. payable on the same date) the payment shall be applied in discharge of each of these debt proportionately.
- First interest then principle
- Director of payer not receiver.
- Right primary of the debtor
[whatever is paid, paid according to the intention of paying it]
- [Quickquid soivitur , sovitur secundum modem solventies]
Example: A owes B, the following debts:
Amount of the debt
Positions of the debt
|Rs.2,000||Due on 10th June|
|Rs.3,000||Due on 20th September|
A sends Rs. 1,500 in the month of June. He neither expressly intimates nor circumstance of the case imply as to which debt the amount is to be applied. Moreover, B also does not appropriate the payment at his own discretion. Therefore, the payment will be appropriated in order of time. However, here in this case two debts are of equal standing. The payment will, therefore, be appropriated in order of time but to all equal standing debts. In this case, Rs.1,500 will be appropriated towards the first two debts of equal standing proportionately, i.e. in the ratio of 2:1.